{"id":12483,"date":"2017-04-04T11:00:00","date_gmt":"2017-04-04T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mickgb.com\/?p=12483"},"modified":"2024-04-08T01:27:18","modified_gmt":"2024-04-08T01:27:18","slug":"firinne-no-fiannaiocht-da-vinci","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mickgb.com\/en\/firinne-no-fiannaiocht-da-vinci\/","title":{"rendered":"Firinne no Fiannaiocht (Da Vinci)"},"content":{"rendered":"

leabhar m\u00f3r-r\u00e1chairte<\/strong>, best-seller; d\u00fashraith<\/strong>, foundation; coirpeacht<\/strong>, criminality; eilimh stairi\u00fala<\/strong>, historic claims; corrbhot\u00fan<\/strong>, an occasional blunder; nach deacair an t-oideachas a bhualadh<\/strong>? \u201cit\u2019s hard to beat the education\u201d; criathar<\/strong>, sieve. <\/p>

.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

F\u00edrinne n\u00f3 Fianna\u00edocht sa Ch\u00f3d?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u201cTruth and Fiction in <\/span>The Da Vinci Code\u201d<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>

by<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

Bart D. Ehrman<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

Peadar Bair\u00e9ad<\/h1>

That Code again!<\/h2>

N\u00edl s\u00e9 chomh fada sin \u00f3 shoin anois, \u00f3 scr\u00edobh m\u00e9 p\u00edosa anseo faoi\u2019n leabhar m\u00f3r-r\u00e1chairte sin, The Da Vinci Code,<\/em><\/strong> agus ag an am sin, caithfidh m\u00e9 a r\u00e1, nach m\u00f3 n\u00e1 s\u00e1sta a bh\u00ed m\u00e9 leis an nd\u00fashraith ar a raibh an sc\u00e9al ar fad t\u00f3gtha, n\u00f3 tuigeadh dom, go raibh s\u00e9 frithchaitliceach, agus bunaithe ar thuairim\u00ed nach bhf\u00e9adfainn fh\u00e9in glacadh leo, sa chaoi nach raibh m\u00e9 cinnte, arbh fhianna\u00edocht, n\u00f3 f\u00edrinne, a bh\u00ed taobh thiar den \u00farsceal corraitheach, l\u00e1n-teannais sin. F\u00e9ach mar a scr\u00edobh m\u00e9 ag an am…<\/p>

\u201cBhuel, n\u00edl dabht ar domhan ann, ach go gcuirfeadh leagan amach agus cur chuige an \u00fadair isteach go m\u00f3r orm fh\u00e9in, mar Chaitliceach, d\u00e1 nglacainn leis go raibh s\u00e9 ag iarraidh a chur ina lu\u00ed orm, go raibh ioml\u00e1n na f\u00edrinne \u00e1 l\u00e9iri\u00fa sa sc\u00e9al seo, n\u00f3 mar is eol daoibh uilig, faoin am seo, is duine m\u00e9 ar cuireadh l\u00e9ann an tsagairt air. Ach sin r\u00e1ite agam, agus m\u00e1 ghlactar leis an sc\u00e9al ar fad mar fhinnsc\u00e9al, a shn\u00edomhann an t-\u00fadar ild\u00e1nach seo thart ar imeachta\u00ed na hEaglaise Caitlic\u00ed, thar thr\u00e9imhse bhreis is m\u00edle bliain, ansin, is f\u00e9idir le Caitliceach \u00e9 a l\u00e9amh, chomh maith le duine ar bith eile. Ach an m\u00e9id sin r\u00e1ite agam, th\u00e1inig m\u00e9 fh\u00e9in chuig pointe \u00e1irithe sa sc\u00e9al, agus bh\u00ed me ar t\u00ed an leabhar a chur ar leataobh, agus f\u00e1il r\u00e9idh leis, n\u00f3 tuigeadh dom, go ndeachaigh s\u00e9 thar f\u00f3ir ar fad leis an sc\u00e9al faoi ph\u00f3sadh \u00e1r dTiarna, faoi naofacht Mh\u00e1ire Mhagdalene, agus faoi choirpeacht agus caime na hEaglaise Caitlic\u00ed….\u201d<\/p>

Bhuel, mar is eol daoibh anois, chr\u00edochnaigh m\u00e9 an sc\u00e9al, agus ansin, scr\u00edobh m\u00e9 p\u00edosa faoi anseo i mB\u00e9al an Phobail, ach ag an am gc\u00e9anna, bh\u00ed s\u00e9 deacair f\u00e1il r\u00e9idh leis na bunphrionsabail ar ar t\u00f3gadh The Da Vinci Code,<\/em><\/strong> fr\u00ed ch\u00e9ile. <\/p>

Library to the Rescue<\/h2>

Nach f\u00e1nach an \u00e1it ina bhfaighfe\u00e1 breac, ad\u00fairt m\u00e9 liom fh\u00e9in, tamall ina dhiaidh sin, nuair a th\u00e1inig m\u00e9 ar leabhar, th\u00edos i Leabharlann an Locha Bhu\u00ed, agus do bhar\u00fail c\u00e9n teideal a bh\u00ed ar an leabhar seo? \u201cTruth an Fiction in The Da Vinci Code\u201d <\/em><\/strong>a bh\u00ed air, agus n\u00ed g\u00e1 a r\u00e1, gur ardaigh m\u00e9 an leabhar sin abhaile liom, go bhfeicfinn c\u00e9ard a bheadh le r\u00e1 ann faoin leabhar m\u00f3r-r\u00e1chairte sin. Ba \u00e9 an f\u00e1th a raibh m\u00e9 chomh t\u00f3gtha sin leis an leabhar seo, n\u00f3 go mba shaineola\u00ed i stair na moch-eaglaise, agus i saol an tSl\u00e1naitheora, a chuir an leabhar seo i dtoll a ch\u00e9ile. Bart D. Ehrman a scr\u00edobh:-<\/p>

Bart D. Ehrman chairs the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. An authority on the early Church and the life of Jesus, he has appeared on A&E, the Hisotory Channel, CNN. and other Television and radio shows.<\/p>

Sin an leabhar domsa, ag an am \u00e1irithe seo, arsa mise liom fh\u00e9in, agus an leabhar \u00e1 sheice\u00e1il amach agam. Ba ghearr go raibh m\u00e9 s\u00e1ite go dt\u00ed an d\u00e1 chluais sa leabhar suimi\u00fail seo. Mar, b\u00edodh gur cuireadh l\u00e9ann an tsagairt ormsa, agus b\u00edodh go raibh staid\u00e9ar d\u00e9anta agam ar ch\u00farsa\u00ed creidimh agus scriopt\u00fair, ag an am gc\u00e9anna, n\u00ed bheadh an oiread sin saineolais agam, le go bhf\u00e9adfainn mo mh\u00e9ar a leagan ar na laig\u00ed a bh\u00ed le f\u00e1il ag an saineola\u00ed seo i nd\u00fashraith an Da Vinci Code. <\/p>

Weaknesses shown up<\/h2>

Ba ghearr \u00e1fach, go raibh tuiscint nua ar fad agam ar na bearna\u00ed, agus ar na laig\u00ed, a bh\u00ed le f\u00e1il go h\u00e9asca ag an saineola\u00ed sna \u201cf\u00edric\u00ed\u201d ar ar t\u00f3gadh \u00farsc\u00e9al m\u00f3r-r\u00e1chairte seo Dan Brown. Cuireann Ehrman chun oibre go deas r\u00e9idh ar an dtionscadal tofa seo. Molann s\u00e9 an t-\u00farsc\u00e9al as a fheabhas mar \u00farsc\u00e9al, ach ansin, t\u00e9ann s\u00e9 go cro\u00ed an \u00e1bhair, nuair adeir s\u00e9….<\/p>

\u201cI knew that the book itself was fictional, of course, but as I read it (and for me, as for many others, it was a real page-turner) I realized that Dan Brown\u2019s characters were actually making historical claims about Jesus, Mary, and the Gospels. In other words, the fiction was being built on a historical foundation that the reader was to accept as factual, not fictitious.<\/p>

Fact or Fiction!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

Ba ghearr \u00e1fach, gur thug an saineola\u00ed seo faoi deara, go raibh deacrachta\u00ed ag baint leis na h\u00e9ilimh stairi\u00fala a deineadh sa leabhar seo. Thug s\u00e9 faoi deara, go raibh dearmaid iomad\u00fala le f\u00e1il ann, maraon leis an gcorrbhot\u00fan fi\u00fa, bot\u00fain n\u00e1r gh\u00e1 a dh\u00e9anamh d\u00e1 raghfa\u00ed i mbun taighde, beag\u00e1in\u00edn n\u00edos c\u00farama\u00ed. Breathnaigh, mar shampla, ar leathanach 143\/44, \u00e1it a labhra\u00edtear faoi \u00cdosa agus M\u00e1ire Mhagdalene, ag bun an leathanaigh sin l\u00e9ifidh t\u00fa :-<\/p>

As with other statements made in The Da Vinci Code, there is more fictional license in these various claims than historical truth. Some of the statements are simply in error. To take just one obvious example: it is wrong to say that when the Gospel of Philip calls Mary Jesus\u2019 \u201ccompanion\u201d that the Aramaic word means \u201cspouse\u201d. For one thing, the word that is used is not Aramaic. The Gospel of Philip is in Coptic. And even though the word used there for \u201ccompanion\u201d actually is a loan word from another language, the language, again is not Aramaic but Greek. In other words, Aramaic has nothing to do with the saying. And to cap it all off, the Greek word that is used (koin\u00f3nos) in fact means not \u201cspouse\u201d (or \u201clover\u201d) but \u201ccompanion\u201d (it is commonly used of friends and associates).<\/p>

Expertise counts<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u201cMuise! nach deacair an t-oideachas a bhualadh!\u201d mar adeireadh muintir Iorrais fad\u00f3.<\/p>

Agus os ag caint ar Mh\u00e1ire agus \u00cdosa at\u00e1 muid, dearbha\u00edonn an saineola\u00ed seo d\u00fainn nach bhfuil bun\u00fas stairi\u00fail, d\u00e1 laghad, ag tac\u00fa le teoiric sin an \u00fadair, Dan Brown, go raibh an bheirt sin p\u00f3sta ar a ch\u00e9ile, agus bheadh sin dona go leor mura raibh ann ach teoiric, ach dearbha\u00edonn an t-\u00fadar sin d\u00fainn, nach \u00e9 amh\u00e1in go raibh siad p\u00f3sta, ach go raibh, i nd\u00e1ir\u00edre, toradh ar an bp\u00f3sadh c\u00e9anna sin.<\/p>

Agus ar chl\u00fadach an leabhair, seo mar a chuireann an t-\u00fadar \u00e9 :-<\/p>

\u201cHow much truth is there in The Da Vinci Code? In some ways the question is raised by The Da Vinci Code itself, as it begins (on p.1. before the Prologue) with a list of items that it labels \u2018FACT\u2019, including… the claim: All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accurate.\u2019<\/p>

Dearbha\u00edonn Dan Brown, mar sin, go bhfuil chuile thagairt a dh\u00e9anann s\u00e9 do dhoicim\u00e9id ina \u00farsc\u00e9al cruinn ceart. N\u00ed g\u00e1 a r\u00e1, nach n-aonta\u00edonn an t-\u00fadar s\u2019againne leis an r\u00e1iteas sin, agus b\u2019in, i nd\u00e1ir\u00edre, a spreag \u00e9 leis an leabhar seo a chur i dtoll a ch\u00e9ile, n\u00f3 th\u00e1inig an Br\u00fanach thar chla\u00ed isteach ina ghort seisean, \u00e1it nach raibh fios a bhealaigh foghlamtha i gceart aige, roimh r\u00e9. Dearbha\u00edonn Dan Brown sa Ch\u00f3d freisin, go raibh baint \u00e1irithe ag an Impire Constantine le roghn\u00fa leabhair an Tiomna Nua, ach deir Bart Ehrman linn, nach raibh baint d\u00e1 laghad ag an Impire leis an socr\u00fa sin, rud a bh\u00ed d\u00e9anta blianta fada roimh r\u00e9 Chonstantine. <\/p>

The Dead Sea Scrolls<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

Agus ag labhairt d\u00f3 faoi \u201cThe Dead Sea Scrolls\u201d tugann Brown le fios d\u00fainn, go bhfuil eolas eic\u00ednt le f\u00e1il ansin faoi \u00cdosa, agus faoi ch\u00farsa\u00ed a shaoil, ach deir an saineola\u00ed linn nach bhfuil tagairt d\u00e1 laghad d\u2019\u00cdosa sna Scrolls c\u00e9anna sin, ach gur dhoicim\u00e9id Ghi\u00fadacha iad.<\/p>

Caithfidh m\u00e9 a admh\u00e1il, gur m\u00f3r an chabhair go deo an leabhar seo, don t\u00e9 a bhfuil amhras air, faoi fh\u00edrinne dh\u00fashraith an Da Vinci Code, n\u00f3 d\u00e1 mba fh\u00edor a leath fh\u00e9in, chuirfeadh s\u00e9 isteach ar chreideamh Chr\u00edosta\u00ed ar bith, ach anois, nuair a scr\u00fada\u00edtear a bhfuil dearbhaithe ag an \u00fadar i The Da Vinci Code go fuarch\u00faiseach, agus nuair a scagtar \u00e9 tr\u00ed chriathar an taighde, agus an tsaineolais, feictear d\u00fainn, go mba ch\u00f3ngara\u00ed d\u2019fhianna\u00edocht n\u00e1 don bhf\u00edrinne, roinnt mhaith de na \u201cf\u00edric\u00ed\u201d ar a bhfuil an \u00farsceal sin bunaithe.<\/p>

Mholfainn do dhuine ar bith a l\u00e9igh an Da Vinci Code, an leabhar seo a fh\u00e1il agus a l\u00e9amh n\u00f3 cuirfidh se ar an eolas \u00e9, agus tuigfidh s\u00e9, nach bhfuil sa leabhar, i ndeireadh na d\u00e1la, ach gn\u00e1th \u00farsc\u00e9al, ina ligtear srian le samhla\u00edocht docheannsaithe an \u00fadair. <\/p>

.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

.<\/span><\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

leabhar m\u00f3r-r\u00e1chairte, best-seller; d\u00fashraith, foundation; coirpeacht, criminality; eilimh stairi\u00fala, historic claims; corrbhot\u00fan, an occasional blunder; nach deacair an t-oideachas a bhualadh? \u201cit\u2019s hard to beat the education\u201d; criathar, sieve. . F\u00edrinne n\u00f3 Fianna\u00edocht sa Ch\u00f3d? \u201cTruth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code\u201d by Bart D. Ehrman Peadar Bair\u00e9ad That Code again! N\u00edl s\u00e9 chomh […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":13435,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12483","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gan-chatagoir"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mickgb.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12483","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mickgb.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mickgb.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mickgb.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mickgb.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12483"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/mickgb.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12483\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12484,"href":"https:\/\/mickgb.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12483\/revisions\/12484"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mickgb.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13435"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mickgb.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12483"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mickgb.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12483"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mickgb.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12483"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}