Litir ó Mheiriceá – Tugadh drochíde ar chónaitheoir fadtéarmach sna Stáit Aontaithe!

Mistreatment of a Long-Term US resident by immigration officials!

Mistreatment of a Long-Term US resident by immigration officials!

The detention of a longtime U.S. resident at San Francisco airport shows how fragile constitutional protections have become — even for those who have lived legally in America for decades.

Instead of being greeted by his wife, Victor Varela Avila was met by immigration officers at San Francisco International Airport in California. They pulled him aside, scanned his ID, and took him away.

He was returning from Japan, where he had visited his son — a U.S. Air Force service member stationed overseas. After more than fifty years of faithfully renewing his green card, this father and grandfather was suddenly detained — his most basic rights ignored.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution guarantee due process to all people within U.S. borders. Permanent residents like Avila are entitled to the same fundamental protections as citizens. Yet he was held for weeks without a clear explanation or immediate judicial review, despite half a century of lawful residency. His case shows us what happens when legal protections are treated as optional.

Avila's life in America

Avila first arrived in San Diego, California, from San Luis, Mexico, in 1967, when he was just sixteen. He worked in the fields beside his father, picking produce in the hot California sun. Over time, he built a career as a legal assistant.

He raised four children and became a grandfather of six. His coworkers describe him as compassionate and reliable, someone who “always put others first.” He has been a green card holder his entire adult life, living, working, and raising his family in the only country he calls home.

Old convictions come to light

Immigration officials justified Avila’s detention by citing a 2009 conviction for DUI and misdemeanor drug possession. He served his 90-day sentence, paid his fines, and moved on. For the next sixteen years, there were no further incidents. His green card was renewed multiple times without issue.

Now, that old offense is being dredged up as grounds for removal. To his family, it feels like punishment without purpose.

“He rebuilt his life with compassion and integrity,” his daughter Carina Mejia said. “My dad’s the most caring person. He’s not a threat, as they are making him out to be.”

Uncertain conditions

After being stopped at the airport, Avila was held in an office without a bed for two weeks. Eventually, he was transferred to the Golden State Annex, an immigrant detention center near Bakersfield, California.

It is a five-hour drive from Chula Vista, California, near the U.S.–Mexico border, making family visits exhausting and infrequent. On Father’s Day, Mejia made the trip. She sat across from him at a bare table as he walked into the room in an orange jumpsuit.

“He comes out and you can see his invisible pain,” she said quietly afterward. “He doesn’t belong there.”

Family Shouldering the Burden

At home in Chula Vista, Avila had been the primary caregiver for his wife, who suffers from chronic health conditions, and for his elderly mother. Neither can drive, and both depended fully on him because of that.

That responsibility now falls to Mejia. She balances caregiving with her job as a clinical social worker and the demands of raising her teenage daughter. “No family should be torn apart like this,” she said. “It is very difficult for us to survive without my father being with us. I just want my dad home again.”

A Community stands with him

Friends, colleagues, and relatives have launched a GoFundMe campaign to cover his legal fees, describing him as “a productive member of society, loved by many.” Supporters argue that keeping him locked up for a nonviolent mistake from sixteen years ago is not justice — it is cruelty.

Avila’s final court date is scheduled for October 2025, when a judge will decide whether he can remain in the United States. This legal hearing will affect not just his future, but that of his entire family.

Broader Implications

But Avila’s case is not just about one man or one family. It reveals a deeper problem: even legal permanent residents are not immune from detention and deportation. A single misstep, no matter how distant or minor, can have a large affect on the whole life of legal residents, on their family stability, and on the whole community.

For Avila and his family, it has been a terrible blow. For the rest of us, it poses a fundamental question: if a man who has lived legally in the United States for more than fifty years — a man who raised children who serve this country, who cared for his wife and mother, and who supported his family through honest work — can be treated without regard for his constitutional rights, who is truly safe?

This erosion of basic human rights is unacceptable in any democracy, and especially in the United States. For decades, America styled itself as the “shining city on a hill,” a beacon of hope and freedom. But when legal residents like Avila can be locked away for an old mistake long since addressed, that vision is tarnished, and it is in danger of collapse.

We must demand that the constitutional rights of all are respected. We must raise our voices, and we must use our votes. When the system can so casually take away Avila’s freedom, it threatens the rights of every one of us.

This should never happen.

 

Mistreatment of a Long-Term US resident by immigration officials!

Ceol sna Sléibhte!

Music in the Mountains!

I recently had the opportunity to participate in a short guitar workshop at the Rocky Ridge Music Center in Estes Park, Colorado. We – myself, my wife Sinéad, and our friend Debbie – took a flight on August 9th from San Diego to Denver. Then we rented a car at the airport and drove up into the mountains to Estes Park.

Sinéad and I stayed in a cabin on the Rocky Ridge campus above the town of Estes Park, while Debbie was based in a hotel in the center of town. All our meals and even snacks and drinks during Happy Hour were included in the package that Sinéad and I had, which created a social and friendly atmosphere.

Workshop and Practice

The workshop started on Sunday and finished on Wednesday (August 10-13). We had six guitar students, five of us being engineers, which added color to our conversations and stories. Our instructor, Colin McAllister, was wonderful, and he is a professor at the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs. He himself began by studying aerospace engineering before transitioning to music as a career.

Each morning, we had "Technique Olympics" and especially exercises from the book Pumping Nylon. We learned how to hold the guitar correctly, and how to place our hands in the right position on the guitar. Then, we did exercises on the fingerboard to gain control of our fingers.

Each afternoon, we prepared for the jam session, selecting a few lively pieces in blues style. The jam itself took place late in the evening, outdoors in the same location as Happy Hour. Everyone got a chance as lead guitarist, with others playing rhythm as background. The music brought joy to the other participants, both piano students and their instructors.

The Performances

We were learning different styles in the workshop — Tibur and Mike W. practicing classical works for the performance, Paul with mandolin along with his guitar, and the other three of us focusing on other aspects - blues and rock music, for example. Our student showcase was on Tuesday evening (August 12). We played an ensemble piece together that we had prepared and practiced with Colin, and Tibur and Mike W. played a jazz song together that represented the class beautifully.

I liked everyone I met. Tibur, a man originally from Hungary, was the first person I met. He was very friendly from the start, and later in the course, he showed me a guitar pedal he had, as well as an app for making recordings. He was a very humble person, and he had the ability to play difficult songs on his guitar.

As the program drew to a close, we thanked Colin and the other students, and the program concluded on Wednesday (August 13) with the faculty concert. Colin played solo, adding variety to the events by playing classical and bluegrass numbers, which drew great applause from the audience.

Social and Natural Experience

During the course, Sinéad and Debbie spent their time exploring Rocky Mountain National Park and Estes Park. They saw a couple of moose, many elk and deer. They went up the mountains to an altitude of 4,000 meters, and saw great mountains and beautiful views. Debbie told us that a herd of elk came into the town streets near her hotel and the police were managing them!

On our way down from Estes Park on Thursday, we stopped in Boulder, Colorado and walked along Pearl Street – a famous street there – and ate a tasty meal before returning to the airport. On the way, we had another special highlight — a black bear climbing an almost vertical rock face, jumping from rock to rock and looking down curiously from time to time at its enchanted audience.

Final Reflection

In truth, it wasn't just a workshop, but also a social event. A community spirit grew among all of us at the camp, between pianists and guitarists. We were all there as learners who had a great love for music, so there was a kind of connection between us beforehand.

Rocky Ridge gave us new insights into music and how to play our musical instruments better. But there was more to it than that. It's a special camp, located in a beautiful place up in the mountains. There isn't much WiFi available, and isn't that a wonderful thing. Additionally, nobody was talking about politics. So, we had a rural sanctuary for ourselves up in the mountains. It reminded us what it means to be human and conscious, and that the world isn't always as bad as we think.

Now that I'm back home, I'm practicing my guitar with new energy and fresh ideas. I hope to return to Rocky Ridge again as soon as possible. As Bono said: Music can change the world because it can change people.

 

 

Litir ó Mheiriceá- An Garda Náisiúnta: Cnámh Spairne Pholaitiúil?

Letter from America – The National Guard: A Political Battleground?

Letter from America – The National Guard: A Political Battleground?

What is the National Guard?

Every state in the United States has its own National Guard – a part-time force with roots in colonial militias. Normally, they are under the command of state governors. They are deployed to assist with emergencies such as floods, wildfires, or riots.

But the president has the power to “federalize” these units – that is, to place them under federal authority and use them in large national missions. Most are part-time soldiers, training one weekend a month and two weeks a year.

Traditionally, their work supports communities: rescues after hurricanes, evacuations during wildfires, distributing COVID-19 vaccines, and helping during major protests.

From Washington to Los Angeles – and now Chicago?

In August 2025, Trump ordered National Guard units into Washington, D.C. to “preserve law and order.” Armed soldiers manned checkpoints and stood in front of schools, angering parents. The slogan became: “Leave our kids alone.”

The irony: crime in D.C. was at its lowest level in 30 years.

In Los Angeles, the Guard was deployed alongside immigration officials, at checkpoints and detention centers – a controversial expansion of its role.

Now Trump is threatening Chicago, a city where crime has already fallen sharply. New York City has also been mentioned as a target.

Trump’s Executive Orders

On August 25, Trump announced an executive order: he wants the Secretary of Defense to establish “special units” within the National Guard to deal with “public order issues.”

Historians and legal experts warn this is a dangerous step, transforming the Guard from a support force into a domestic police force.

He also claimed he had “saved D.C. from destructive crime,” even though crime rates were at their lowest in a generation. And he went further still: ordering the Department of Justice to impose a one-year prison sentence on anyone who burns a U.S. flag – though he has no authority to do so.

The Facts Trump Ignores

The White House says deployments are needed in response to crime. But the numbers tell a different story:

  • Shootings and homicides in Chicago are down 23–30% this year; 2024 was the safest year in five years.
  • Crime in Washington, D.C. is at its lowest in 30 years.
  • Republican-run cities like Shreveport, Louisiana and Charleston, West Virginia are far more violent – yet no Guard has been sent there.

It’s plain: Democratic cities are being labeled “lawless,” while worse problems exist in Red states.

Red Flags

The 1878 Posse Comitatus Act prohibits regular federal troops from acting as police. While the National Guard is usually under governors’ control, the President can place them under federal command in certain situations.

But usually this happens with the consent of the state itself – not through threats from the White House.

A Strong Response from Pritzker

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker left no doubt about his stance after learning of Trump’s threats against Chicago:

“This is a manufactured crisis, not a real one. It has nothing to do with crime. It has everything to do with Donald Trump’s political nightmare.”

He called the move “unconstitutional, illegal, and un-American.”

He emphasized the facts:

  • 13 of the 20 cities with the highest murder rates are under Republican leadership.
  • 8 of the 10 states with the highest murder rates have Republican governors.
  • “Chicago isn’t even on those lists.”

And his strongest message:

“Mr. President, don’t come here to Chicago.

We don’t want you here, and you are not welcome here.”

The Danger of Authoritarianism

Until recently, the United States was viewed as a model of democratic practice.

But when leaders use military force against their own citizens, it signals a slide toward authoritarianism. And once military power is brought into civilian life, it is hard to remove.

Conclusion

The National Guard’s presence in D.C. and Los Angeles reveals a dangerous misuse: soldiers being deployed to police politics instead of protecting people.

By exposing the lies and standing firm, leaders in Chicago remind us of a simple truth: The National Guard was not created to frighten civilians, but to protect them.

 

 

 

Miotais Intleachta Saorga!

AI Myths!

AI Myths: Energy, Water, and Artists

As artificial intelligence (AI) technology rapidly improves, myths and misconceptions about it spread just as quickly. That's not to say everything about AI is perfect, because it's not. But at the same time, it's important to distinguish between fact and fiction. In today's article, we tackle some of the common myths about AI's impact on the environment and its effect on creative industries.

Energy Use in Context

First and foremost, AI's energy consumption is often exaggerated. The challenge is understanding the scale and context of its energy usage. To put things in perspective, the technology sector, which includes all digital technologies, with AI estimated to be about 20% of it, accounts for less than 4% of global energy consumption according to the International Energy Agency's 2023 report.

Since AI often replaces other technologies, the environmental impact of those other technologies must be considered. According to a study in Nature Scientific Reports by Lannelongue et al. (2021), paper-based art could emit between 310-2,900 times more CO₂ than AI-generated art. Additionally, handwriting can be 130-1,500 times more carbon-intensive than typing with AI assistance.

Ongoing innovation is being developed in energy-efficient algorithms and specialized hardware that are already significantly reducing these demands. Without doubt, further improvements will come soon.

Water Usage Is Overstated

Another concern regarding AI technology is its water usage. It's said that data centers consume water to cool their computers, but you need to put this in a broader context to understand it. For example, X.AI (Elon Musk's AI company developing the Grok AI model) has a facility in Texas that used about the same amount of water over a two-year period as the average Texan uses in a single day. Given that Texas receives around 480 trillion liters of rainfall per year, AI's water usage has minimal impact in reality.

Another concern regarding AI technology is its water usage. It's said that data centers consume water to cool their computers, but you need to put this in a broader context to understand it. For example, X.AI (Elon Musk's AI company developing the Grok AI model) has a facility in Texas that used about the same amount of water over a two-year period as the average Texan uses in a single day. Given that Texas receives around 480 trillion liters of rainfall per year, AI's water usage has minimal impact in reality.

AI vs. Creators

Creative industries strongly argue that AI is stealing from artists. They're right when AI breaks legitimate copyright, but this doesn't happen very often. Artists' works are used to train AI, but that's not theft per se. Artists also use other artists' works to learn. Work is currently underway to address this issue. For example, some AI companies are developing systems to identify artists and pay them for their work.

On the other hand, artists can use AI as a tool. Consider independent filmmaker Sarah Rodriguez, who used AI-generated art to secure funding for her documentary. After securing funding, she hired human artists for the final artwork, demonstrating how AI can enhance artists' work rather than replace it.

AI expands access to creative solutions while simultaneously pushing human artists to innovate and redefine their craft.

Change Follows a Pattern

During the 1990s and 2000s, the internet was scrutinized for being wasteful, expensive, and a threat to traditional jobs. The same concerns emerged with the arrival of cell towers, digital cameras, and design software. Over time, significant changes occurred in society, allowing clerks to learn and effectively use Excel, and film photographers learned to master digital editing.

AI represents the next step in this evolution. The key competency for future professionals will be AI literacy, which is the ability to create effective prompts, critically evaluate AI outputs, and integrate AI-generated content with human expertise. AI courses and workshops are available at LinkedIn Learning, Coursera, and other companies to help people who want to develop and improve their AI skills.

AI Is Just a Tool

Perhaps the most critical point about AI is that it's not a person. It's a sophisticated tool that collects digital data to fulfill human requests. Given the amount of information on the internet, such tools are essential.

Creative technologies have always been a cause for concern. But with new creative technologies come new opportunities. Those who oppose technology risk being left behind, similar to the Luddites, those textile workers who protested against machinery during the Industrial Revolution.

Conclusion

The myths surrounding AI have some basis in truth, but they're often exaggerated. When we examine the figures in a broader context, we can extract the truth.

As we look toward the future, new challenges will emerge. Thoughtful policies and ethical frameworks will be needed for issues concerning data privacy, algorithmic bias, and economic displacement. But addressing these challenges requires the precise understanding this article supports. Neither uncritical enthusiasm nor apocalyptic fear will serve us well.

As more AI enters our lives, it's important to learn how to use it effectively. AI can help us in various areas, from creating art to making office work easier.

 

 

 

 

Bata agus Bóthar!

The Boot!

The recent decision to remove Erika L. McEntarfer, Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), from her position is an extremely irresponsible act that puts the American economy at risk. It is concerning whenever a government puts its thumb on the scale for political purposes. The BLS reports statistics as they are, based on the data it collects. American presidents in the past understood this and did not interfere with these facts. As Janet Yellen, former Treasury Secretary and former Federal Reserve Chair, said, this is "the kind of thing you would expect in a corrupt country."

The Hard Work Behind the Data

The BLS is not run by an individual working on a private spreadsheet. About 40 full-time experts work diligently at the Bureau to issue monthly reports on employment, inflation, and other critical indicators. When a president dismisses the Bureau's Commissioner, it doesn't look good, nor does it change the truth. Such an action can create a crisis of confidence, which brings other major problems.

Unfortunately, the accuracy of the data is already under threat. The BLS budget has been reduced by about 19% in real terms since 2009, according to Axios (a statistical association in America). Additionally, participation in the Bureau's surveys has declined. But there are solutions to these problems: increased investment in the Bureau and a better understanding of the causes of declining participation, to address it effectively. Some critics say the BLS methodology is outdated. But what's needed is additional investment, not political interference, to fix this.

We've Seen This Before

Kevin Hassett, Director of the National Economic Council, recently admitted that the goal is to "put in one of our own people." That should sound every alarm. This is political interference. An important question needs to be answered: Will senior government officials - Bessent, Hassett, and others - set aside the truth for the sake of their own careers?

The Greek government concealed inflation data and budget deficits to meet EU criteria. This resulted in a debt crisis, international bailout, and years of economic crisis. In Argentina, the government falsified inflation figures and gross domestic product (GDP) to hide an economic crisis. As a result, foreign investment declined, interest rates rose sharply, and the peso fell. They are still paying for it.

If tariffs, spending, and supply disruptions are driving inflation, false reports won't stop prices from rising at the store, at the gas station, or in the bond market.

The bond market, in particular, is merciless. If that market loses confidence in the figures published by the BLS, lenders will demand higher interest rates as a result. As Bill Blain, a bond trader in London, wrote in his newsletter 'Blain's Morning Porridge': "August 1, 2025, might be remembered as the day the US bond market died. There was an art to reading US data. It was based on trust. Now that's broken - if you can't trust the data, what else can you believe?"

Jerome Powell

The attacks on Jerome Powell, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, are also dangerous. He is running an independent central bank, and his decisions should be based on data, not political expediency. He cannot be easily removed from his position, but that hasn't stopped the president from putting continuous pressure on him to lower interest rates.

This is not new. Turkey's Erdogan did the same thing, and it created widespread inflation, currency collapse, and economic instability. When loyalty is placed above expertise, disaster always follows.

The Root Problem

Despite his messages, the president's new spending bill (which he himself calls the Big Beautiful Bill) will add another $3.5 trillion to the national debt. Tariffs also carry major risks, including increased inflation rates, and it's not clear what real benefit they provide.

Authoritarianism at the Door?

This is not just about the BLS. A broader perspective needs to be considered: dissent is being punished, human rights are being revoked without due process, and electoral districts are being distorted. If critics are silenced and independent information is blocked, what will stop the next step?

Look at Ortega in Nicaragua: critics forced into exile, citizenship revoked, journalists killed. It starts with small steps. It ends in disaster. Blain imagined a future where a "Ministry of Economic Truth" would issue press releases: "Under the President's leadership, the US economy continues to grow at an unprecedented rate. Payroll data from the Ministry of Truth shows full employment across America." If nothing is done to address this, the same will happen in America. It begins when information is distorted to serve the president.

A Call to Action for Americans

It's uncertain whether the United States will have democracy or authoritarianism in the future. Democracy is a fragile system, and the public needs to be informed about it and participate in it. I hope every American will be ready to defend their system. Write to your elected representatives, participate in awareness campaigns, and support organizations that protect government transparency. Organizations like Project On Government Oversight (POGO) and Open The Government – these are organizations working diligently to protect government transparency and ensure accurate data for citizens. Every citizen will have the opportunity to cast their vote in next year's midterm election, and to elect representatives who will work for them, not for authoritarianism.

Good advice can be found in the West Point Cadets' prayer (training center): "Take the right but difficult choice instead of the wrong but easy one." This principle is not being applied at all by the current US government. If the administration's behavior continues in this way, we are not far from an America we don't recognize.

If the opportunity to stop this foolishness is lost, truth will be lost. If truth is lost, democracy will be lost.

 

 

 

en_USEnglish