Deis na Seamróige!

Shamrock Opportunity!

In a few weeks, the Taoiseach will stand in the East Room of the White House. The bowl of shamrock will be presented. Cameras will click and flash. The familiar annual words about friendship and historic ties will be heard.

But behind that ceremony, a more serious question lies hidden.

More than €20 billion in corporate tax was collected in Ireland last year, much of it from a small number of multinational companies headquartered in the United States. It is therefore natural for Taoiseach Micheál Martin to be cautious in conversation with President Trump, since no one can predict the response if tensions were to arise. What should the Taoiseach do — remain silent, or speak honestly about our views?

To navigate an international landscape that is becoming more uncertain by the minute, it is worth looking to Canada and its Prime Minister, Mark Carney.

Carney is known internationally as the former Governor of the Bank of Canada and later of the Bank of England. He earned respect for his steadiness during periods of financial turmoil. His credibility rests on action rather than words.

Carney’s grandparents were from County Mayo. He holds Irish citizenship and frequently speaks publicly about that rich heritage.

There are structural similarities between Canada and Ireland. Both countries are deeply economically integrated with the United States. Both rely heavily on open trade with it, and both are vulnerable when the tone or direction of American policy shifts. Recently, that risk has become more visible and more significant.

Carney’s response has been measured. At Davos earlier this year, he outlined what might be called a “middle-power strategy.” He did not attack the United States. Instead, he argued that smaller countries strengthen themselves through coordination and cooperation with one another.

That principle was evident recently in the case of Greenland. When President Trump renewed his interest in acquiring Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark, Denmark and the government of Greenland responded clearly: the territory was not for sale nor open for negotiation. European Union leaders expressed support for Denmark, and NATO partners reaffirmed their security commitments in the Arctic. The tariff threats associated with the dispute were withdrawn, and the matter did not escalate into a broader crisis.

The episode demonstrated the strength of allies when they stand together.

Canada will continue to trade and cooperate with the United States while at the same time expanding its economic and strategic options. That is risk management. Diversification reduces vulnerability.

In Ireland, a significant portion of corporate tax revenue depends on a small number of companies based in the United States. Pharmaceutical and technology exports to America make up a substantial part of our trade balance. If there were a sudden shift in Washington’s policy, Ireland’s economy would be hit harder than that of many larger EU countries with more diversified revenue bases.

Ireland can maintain and strengthen its economic relationship with the United States while at the same time expanding trade and investment links elsewhere — independently and through the European Union. A broader trade base reduces the risk associated with policy changes in any single capital.

That brings us back to St. Patrick’s Day.

Year after year, proposals are put forward calling for a boycott of the White House visit. But it would not be wise to take that advice. Ireland has symbolic access in Washington that countries of similar size do not enjoy. That access is a significant opportunity.

In my view, the question is not whether the Taoiseach should attend Washington. The real question is how Micheál Martin will use that opportunity on St. Patrick’s Day.

The Taoiseach can calmly and clearly express Ireland’s commitment to cooperation based on international rules and predictable trade. He can articulate his position without jeopardizing the partnership. That is consistent with Ireland’s diplomatic tradition and aligned with many of its European partners.

Carney’s emphasis on diversification is appropriate for a world that is more uncertain than before. He offers a practical approach — not only for Canada, but for countries like Ireland navigating this new world without a map. All that remains now for Micheál Martin is to seize the opportunity on St. Patrick’s Day.

 

Litir ó Mheiriceá –  Scéal Dochreidte Donna Hughes-Brown

Letter from America- The Unbelievable Story of Donna Hughes-Brown

Donna Hughes-Brown has been released from the Campbell County Detention Center in Kentucky, hundreds of miles from her family in Missouri, after spending five months in custody. Her crime? Two bad checks (worth $80 in total) that she wrote at a grocery store more than ten years ago and for which she had already paid restitution.

It is a great relief that this Irish grandmother is now free, after being caught in the net of immigration enforcement currently taking place in the United States (USA). Her husband, Jim Brown, says the policy has "completely devastated" their family and clearly demonstrates the cruelty of the US government.

Unexpected Problem in Chicago

The nightmare began in July 2025. Donna and her husband Jim Brown had travelled to Ireland to attend the funeral of Donna's aunt. It was a routine trip for Donna, who was born in England to Irish parents in 1966 and moved to the United States in 1977 at the age of 11.

Despite having a Green Card for nearly half a century and having travelled internationally many times without any problem, this time was different. According to Jim, Donna had no problem at US Customs Preclearance in Dublin. However, when she landed at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago, the couple was separated.

"She was given entry clearance in Dublin and was arrested anyway," Jim Brown said recently. He was told his wife only needed to sign some documents. Instead, she was handcuffed, detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and imprisoned in Kentucky.

Trump signed the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" on July 4, 2025. As part of that bill, the legislation of the Immigration and Nationality Act was amended, stating that the government can arrest people (who are not citizens) who violated any law in the past twenty years. The law came into effect on July 24, when Donna and Jim were already in Ireland.

"Crimes of Moral Turpitude"

Between 2012 and 2015, Donna was a single mother struggling and facing a serious financial crisis. She wrote two bad cheques at a local grocery store.

"They were for less than $80 combined," Jim Brown explained in testimony he gave at a Congressional hearing. "She was charged with a misdemeanor, paid the restitution, and completed one year of probation. That happened ten years ago." Under the new interpretation of immigration law, these misdemeanors are now being classified as "crimes of moral turpitude." On this basis, the government can strip Donna of her right of residency and deport her from the USA.

Important Campaign

Jim has been campaigning for months on behalf of his wife. He admits that he voted for Donald Trump because he believed Trump's promises that immigrants who were violent criminals would be arrested and deported. But he now believes the government is targeting people like his wife to meet deportation quotas.

"Look at the news, and the government isn't telling the truth about what is happening to many legal immigrants," Jim said. "The worst thing is that Trump is so disrespectful to people, so inflammatory and retaliatory, that people are afraid to say anything."

Confrontation in Washington

The case reached a tipping point in Washington, D.C., during a hearing on "Worldwide Threats to the Homeland." Jim Brown stood in the gallery while Democratic representatives placed strong pressure on Kristi Noem, DHS Secretary and a Trump ally, regarding the immorality of Donna being held without trial.

Representative Seth Magaziner of Rhode Island forced Noem to address the human cost of her department's policies. "He is a Navy combat veteran who served our country in the Gulf War," Magaziner said, referring to Jim. "He is married to a woman named Donna who came to our country legally when she was 11 years old... Because of you, Donna has been in prison for the last four months."

When Noem tried to avoid the question, saying she wasn’t responsible for which laws should be enforced, Magaziner pushed back, noting her broad discretion as Secretary to issue parole. Under the gaze of the committee and under the gaze of the distraught husband, Noem finally conceded: "I will review the case."

Pattern of Targeting

Donna's ordeal is not an isolated incident. There are striking similarities between her case and the case of another Irish person - Cliona Ward. Although she has a Green Card, Ward was arrested at San Francisco International Airport in April 2025 after a visit to Ireland, due to minor offenses that also go back almost 20 years. Although Ward was finally released in May, her detention indicated that this new aggressive enforcement strategy was beginning.

Home for Christmas

The story reached a happy conclusion at the critical court hearing on December 18. Despite fears that it would be delayed again, Donna was released from ICE custody.

Previously, Jim said: "Show me where it is written in the Bible that it is right to do something like this. It is wrong, period!" Now, after five months of hardship and uncertainty, Donna will be able to celebrate Christmas at home with her family in Missouri.

"She is one hundred percent innocent. She is in this country legally," Jim said. Now, finally, justice has been achieved for them.

Uachtarán na hÉireann Catherine Connolly  –	Teanga, Cultúr agus Cothromaíocht

President of Ireland Catherine Connolly - Language, Culture and Balance

When Catherine Connolly was elected President of Ireland in October 2025, it was clear that a significant change was taking place in the political mood of the country, and that new values were being expressed through her victory. Connolly was the first woman ever to serve as Leas-Cheann Comhairle (Deputy Speaker) of the Dáil, and now she becomes the first independent President from Galway. She is a woman who places honesty and openness at the heart of her public life — especially regarding issues connected with the Irish language, Irish unity, the environment, neutrality, and social equality.

Biography and Roots

Catherine Connolly was born in Shantalla, Galway, where she was raised as one of fourteen children. She earned a Master’s degree in Clinical Psychology from the University of Leeds in 1981, before returning to the Claddagh in Galway, where she still lives with her husband Brian and their two adult sons. She later completed a Law degree at the University of Galway in 1989 and was called to the Bar in 1991. Her public life began in 1999 when she was elected to Galway City Council, and a few years later she became Mayor in 2004 — a period that deepened her awareness of Ireland’s cultural and linguistic identity. She was elected as an independent TD in 2016 and as Leas-Cheann Comhairle in 2020, confirming her as one of the most principled and fair-minded voices in Irish politics.

Return to the Irish Language

Connolly was not raised as a fluent Irish speaker. As she herself has said: “I only had the Irish I learned in school. I was embarrassed when I realised I couldn’t speak naturally with people in the Gaeltacht.” During her time as Mayor, after an event in Conamara where she found herself unable to say even a few words in Irish, she promised herself she would change that. She later completed a diploma course in Irish, and as she said afterwards: “I went back and learned it properly. And in the Dáil, from the very first day I was elected, I placed emphasis on Irish — as a living, vibrant language.” Gradually, Irish became a natural part of her daily life. She began using it in her speeches, interviews, and debates in the Dáil. She often reminds the public: “Irish is not a cultural ornament. It lies at the heart of who we are as a people.”

The Irish Language as a National Issue

Connolly’s election revealed how central the Irish language has become in political debate in Ireland today. Emer Higgins, a Fine Gael TD and Minister of State, said after the election that the government should “reflect on how central Irish was in the presidential race.” “I visited a school in Rathcoole,” Higgins said. “A pupil asked me, ‘Do you think Heather will lose because she doesn’t have Irish?’ Only one student in the class was fluent, yet every single one said it would matter to them if a presidential candidate spoke Irish.” For the first time in many years, Irish emerged as a major campaign theme across social media and news sites such as Tuairisc.ie and Extrag.ie. In an Irish Times poll, 3% of respondents said that “a person who speaks Irish” was the most important quality for a presidential candidate. While not a large number, it signaled a growing awareness of the language’s importance in political life. At the start of her campaign, Connolly herself stated: “It is essential that the President has Irish — not as a legal requirement, but as an expression of who we are as a nation.”

From Galway to Áras an Uachtaráin

Connolly’s roots run deep in Galway, a city where art, science, and community spirit meet. Before entering national politics, she worked as a barrister and city councillor and later as Mayor, known for her integrity and independence of mind. In the 2020 general election, she won a seat as an Independent TD for Galway West, and a few months later surprised many when she was elected Leas-Cheann Comhairle with 77 votes to the Government candidate’s 74. “I went for it,” she said, “because I couldn’t demand gender equality and then fail to act on it myself.”

Culture and Identity

For Connolly, language and culture are inseparable. As President, she is expected to emphasise the links between art, education, and language — “the three pillars of human society,” as she calls them. She believes Irish should not be left confined to classrooms or translation desks but returned to the heart of public life. “It is a living, central language. It is not a dead one,” she has said.

The Environment and Natural Balance

Connolly is also a passionate advocate for the environment. She believes it is not merely a technical matter but a moral one. “If we protect the land and the sea, we are protecting our heritage.”

Neutrality and Human Rights

Throughout her career, Connolly has consistently defended Ireland’s neutrality. “Neutrality is not the absence of action,” she said, “but an active commitment to peace.”

Reconciliation and Irish Unity

“We must create spaces where people can feel comfortable with their identity,” she says. “That is the beginning of reconciliation.”

Conclusion

It is a great honour to have Catherine Connolly as our President. She is an Irishwoman through and through, who will represent us with dignity on the national and international stage. At home, she will promote our language and culture. Abroad, she will stand against war, for human rights, and for our neutrality. In her own words: “Irish came back to me through patience, love, and daily use. Anyone can do the same.”

An Ghéarchéim Cógaisíochta!

The Pharmaceutical Crisis!

Background

The pharmaceutical industry is the backbone of the Irish economy, contributing significantly to employment, investment and innovation in the country. Many years ago, the Industrial Development Agency (IDA) lured pharmaceutical and technology companies to Ireland with an offer they found hard to refuse, namely a very favourable tax regime compared to their domestic tax regimes in the United States of America (US) and the European Union (EU). It is no surprise, then, that Ireland has been heavily criticized for its tax system by the US and the EU (particularly France and Germany) and the United Kingdom (UK). In response to this international pressure, the Irish government has overhauled its tax system, abolishing the complex scheme known as the ‘Double Irish’ (in 2020) and adopting a global minimum tax rate (in 2021) set by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Unfortunately, these significant changes have not silenced its critics. Trump raised the issue with Taoiseach Micheál Martin in the Oval Office of the White House on 12 March, saying: “You have taken over our pharmaceutical companies and other companies… The US pharmaceutical industry is completely in the hands of this beautiful island of 5 million people.” He threatened to impose a 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals imported from Ireland to the US. Was President Trump right?

The Problem

President Trump made a good point, and that is a cause for concern, as the Irish economy is heavily dependent on exports to the US, but particularly pharmaceutical exports. In 2024, Ireland exported €224 billion of goods to other countries; of that €72.6 billion of goods to the US, and of that €58 billion of pharmaceuticals. That is a significant number, when you put it in context. The three largest exporters to the US in the EU last year (2024) were Germany (€161 billion), Ireland (€72 billion) and Italy (€65 billion). What is going on here? It is money laundering, albeit legal.

A Couple of Examples

  1. Intellectual Property (IP) & Royalty Payments

Imagine that the company ‘Drugs’ creates a new drug in the US called ‘Relief’. Instead of registering the patent in the United States, Drugs registers the patent under its subsidiary in Ireland, Drugs Ireland.

Now, every time Drugs (US) sells Relief in the United States, US Drugs must pay a royalty fee to Drugs Ireland for the use of the patent. Needless to say, the royalty fee is intentionally very high. Therefore, profits are lower in the United States (because of the royalty fees), and higher in Ireland (where the tax is lower).

  1. Price Manipulation

Drugs Ireland makes Relief for $10 per pill. Instead of selling the drug directly to customers, Drugs Ireland sells it to US Drugs for $200 per pill. US Drugs then sells the pill in the United States for $220 per pill.

In this case, US Drugs reports a profit of $20 per pill in the United States, while Irish Drugs receives a profit of $190 per pill, which is taxable at a lower rate in Ireland. This keeps most of the profit in Ireland (where tax is lower).

Implications?

Many of the world’s pharmaceutical companies are based in the United States. There is a huge market for prescription drugs, and high prices have long been a controversial issue there. This is a political and economic concern in the United States, and puts pressure on its government’s pharmaceutical policies. The Irish government is receiving money that should have been paid to the US government, and the American people are having to pay for that shortfall in the form of higher pharmaceutical prices. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick says this is a scam.

“We have to try to tackle the tax scams that are going on. Ireland is my favorite. Ireland had a $60 billion budget surplus last year. So [America] loses two trillion and they make $60 (billion). What do they do? They have all our intellectual property for our great technology. Our big tech companies and great pharmaceutical companies - they put all their intellectual property there because there is low tax to pay, and they don’t pay the US at all. So that’s over,” the secretary said.

Trump has threatened to impose tariffs on drugs coming from Ireland to the US – up to 200%. That would have a huge impact on the Irish economy and a deep recession in the country.

Solution?

It is clear that Trump (and Lutnick) are serious and in the absence of any other solution, they will most likely continue with steep tariffs on drugs coming from Ireland.

It is essential to put strategic policies in place to avoid such a crisis. The above schemes need to be implemented, and a plan needs to be devised and shared with the US government to phase them out in stages. If adopted, this will give us more time to find a long-term solution. The government needs to invest in the pharmaceutical and technology sectors, to create a business environment in the country, that will provide opportunities to people to set up companies, and attract qualified employees to them. Ireland has the appropriate expertise to reduce our dependence on the US as quickly as possible, and to diversify the economy which would be of great benefit to the country in the future. It is late and it is difficult, but we have no other choice now!

 

 

 

Olltoghchán 2024 – Scamaill dhorcha ag bun na spéire!

2024 General Election – Dark clouds looming!

 

Now that the general election is over, and the bargaining is in full swing, I think it’s time for a post-mortem examination.

If you were to take a quick look at what happened in the general election, you would think that the people of the country are quite happy. The main parties in government – Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael – were not thrown out, but they won more seats in the 2024 general election – 86, than in the 2020 general election – 73. It will be easier for them to reach 88 seats this time and form a coalition. 

Vote of Confidence?

Is it a vote of confidence in the current government? That is the big question, in my opinion. To discuss it, it is necessary to look behind the results.

Firstly, only 59.7% of the electorate in the country voted, one of the lowest percentages ever. This is not a good sign, as it reflects the dissatisfaction of those who are not involved in the process. When that percentage is falling, as it has been in this case, it would appear that democracy is deteriorating, and people have less confidence in that system.

Secondly, the electorate had no choice but to return Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael to power. Incidentally, the Green Party was a scapegoat and Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael blamed them for any harsh criticism the current government received – especially regarding the government’s green policies, even though they were obliged by the European Union to implement them. The Greens lost 11 seats in the general election, and as part of that defeat, the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media, Catherine Martin TD, lost her seat and her Ministry. Any minor party will be afraid to enter a coalition with Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael from now on!

Although you would have thought that Sinn Féin would be in the running this time, they lost support for the first time in 35 years. They certainly made a few mistakes. And they were slow to recognise that a large proportion of their supporters was not happy with Sinn Féin’s stance on immigration. They lost support from people who had a negative view of immigration, and who wanted strong immigration policies in place, to limit the number of immigrants coming into the country. Some of these seem to have moved towards right-wing parties – Aontú or Independent Ireland, for example. In any case, Sinn Féin is not in a position to form a coalition, mainly because it is unlikely that Fianna Fáil or Fine Gael would join them in coalition. So, it is clear that Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael have not received any kind of mandate from the Irish people, and that they will remain in power despite the important problems that they have not yet resolved, after one or both of them have been in power for a long time. There are major crises and Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael are still talking about them and saying what they will do – but there is not much progress to be seen, in reality. I am talking basically about housing, homelessness and health issues, not to mention immigration issues. The government cannot be excused for its inaction on these ongoing crises that have not been resolved for more than a decade. We are a wealthy country, with a trade surplus for years, not to mention the windfall tax (€13 billion) from Apple that is due to hit the exchequer soon. It is hard to imagine that people would be happy with Fianna Fáil or Fine Gael, given their terrible political record.

Against the grain

It is clear that the majority of people around the world are not happy with their democratic governments. In 2024, most parties in power were weakened or ousted. This happened in America, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Austria, Sweden, Finland, Greece, Argentina, Ecuador, Japan and South Africa. But this did not happen in Ireland, and it is an exception. As I said earlier, people did not have a viable alternative, in contrast to the countries mentioned above. In those countries, people were able to express their discontent politically, because there were other strong parties available to them as options. This is not yet the case in Ireland, but it is not difficult to imagine the emergence of a charismatic leader who would be able to speak directly to those who feel they have no input into the political process. That person would likely be on the right wing, with a vision very different from the parties in power. If that happens, and if such a person and his party win a mandate in the country’s general election, it is likely that a restructuring of government would follow. Without a doubt, democracy as we know it would be in trouble in that case. Look, for example, at what is happening in the United States, which was the world’s beacon of democracy until 2016. With Trump as President of America, it will be difficult for the country to save democracy. And we all know how the dictator’s story ends!

Recommendations

It is not over until the fat lady sings, and we still have a chance in Ireland to avoid an oppressive government. Members of government need to go out into their constituencies among their constituents, and they need to listen to them about the problems they have that the government could solve. Then, they need to formulate policies to address those problems and deliver on what they say. It is high time for the government to be proactive, and they already know about the important ongoing problems that still exist and are getting worse. It is vital that we as voters put pressure on our TDs to deliver on their promises, as our representatives must be held accountable to us.

If the government does not change its approach and implement its policies without delay, as well as addressing any other issues facing its constituents, it is likely that they will be out of a job after the next election. Unfortunately, such incompetence would be a major opportunity for the right wing to attract voters in their direction, and this must be avoided at all costs.

 

 

 

 

 

.

.

.

.

.

.

Olltoghchán 2024 – Scamaill dhorcha ag bun na spéire!

2024 General Election – Key Issues and Party Proposals (FF,FG,SF)!

2024 General Election – Key Issues and Party Proposals (FF,FG,SF)!

The general election is almost upon us! Politicians are making their promises liberally on traditional and social media, and the parties have published lengthy manifestos online. How can we separate the wheat from the chaff?

Manifestos

I have read the manifestos published by Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Sinn Féin, and they are incredibly detailed. It was not easy to compare the policies of the parties, as all the manifestos have different structures. Worse, even after finding certain policies in the three manifestos, you are still comparing apples and oranges. Every policy should have a budget, an objective and a deadline, but often it is just ambitious goals, without the details. The Sinn Féin manifesto is better than the others in clearly stating their policies.

Anyway, after reading the manifestos, I summarised the main issues in the election and the plans of the three parties to tackle them. I will share it with you here, and you may find it useful.

Summary: Main Issues and Proposals of the Parties (FF,FG,SF)

  1. Cost of Living: The cost of living is a major concern, although falling interest rates and the €10.5 billion budget package may ease the pain.
  • Fianna Fáil: Increase the State Pension to at least €350 a week; cap childcare fees at €200 a month.
  • Fine Gael: Raise the threshold for the highest tax bands by €2,000 each year; increase primary tax credits by €75 each year; changes to reduce the Universal Social Charge (USC); changes to reduce inheritance tax; cap childcare fees at €200 per month.
  • Sinn Féin: End USC on the first €45,000 of income, saving €1,100 per year; €1,000 rent relief; temporary mortgage relief up to €1,250 per year; €10 per day childcare.
  1. Housing Crisis:According to a poll last year, 61% of respondents said the housing crisis is one of the worst problems in Ireland. It is no wonder that Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael, and Sinn Féin have made housing a top priority in their manifestos.
  • Fianna Fáil: Expand housebuilding to 60,000 per year by 2030; prioritize affordable and social homes.
  • Fine Gael: Build 300,000 homes by 2030, with a budget of €40 billion.
  • Sinn Féin: Build 370,000 homes by 2030, including 125,000 social and affordable homes by 2029; three-year rent freeze.
  1. Healthcare: In ainneoin barrachas buiséid de bheagnach €2.2 billiún, léiríonn daoine a míshástacht leis an gcóras cúram sláinte, go háirithe maidir le plódú ospidéil agus liostaí feithimh fairsinge.
  • Fianna Fáil: Reduce waiting times by expanding hospital beds, consultants and GPs; provide new Rapid Access Outpatient clinics; reduce health fees; free medical cards for all children under 12, and specialist services for cancer care and women's health.
  • Fine Gael: Expand healthcare capacity with 5,000 new hospital beds, six surgical centres, and four elective hospitals; extend free GP care to under-18s, and cap prescription costs at €50.
  • Sinn Féin: Universal healthcare with free prescriptions; 5,000 new hospital beds, and four elective hospitals in place by 2031; expand GP services; improve mental health care and supports for people with disabilities; recruit 40,000 healthcare workers; invest €15 billion in infrastructure, and save €1 billion through effective reforms, ensuring equitable and modern healthcare.

And the Irish Language?

Here are the main proposals proposed by the three parties regarding the Irish language.

  1. Government Leadership and Policy
  • Sinn Féin: Create a new position in Government for a Senior Minister for the Irish Language and the Gaeltacht, to prioritise Irish language and Gaeltacht issues.
  1. Funding and Investment
  • Sinn Féin: Establish a dedicated Irish Language Capital Programme to create Cultural Centres and develop Irish Language Quarters in urban areas.
  • Sinn Féin: Provide an additional €50 million in current funding over five years and €75 million in capital expenditure specifically for the Irish language and Gaeltacht development.
  1. Education
  • Fianna Fáil: Increase the number of Irish-medium schools and Gaelcholáistí, improve teacher training, and expand the Gaeltacht Schools Recognition Scheme.
  • Fine Gael: Strengthen Naíonraí within and outside the Gaeltacht, and expand Irish immersion education for primary school children in the Gaeltacht.
  • Sinn Féin: Provide free Irish language books to all children and teenagers, once during primary school and once during secondary school.
  1. Cultural and Community Support
  • Fine Gael: Work with housekeepers and summer colleges to support Irish language immersion programmes.
  • Sinn Féin: Develop cultural centres and create Irish language Quarters with additional funding for language planning.
  1. Labour and Legal Rights
  • Sinn Féin: Make state websites bilingual; extend language requirements to print and online advertisements.
  • Sinn Féin: Achieve 20% bilingual public servants by 2030, with a B2+ Irish language proficiency requirement for state roles.

Conclusion

I hope the above comparisons give you a better understanding of the differences between the plans of Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Sinn Féin in relation to the policies that are most pressing for us as citizens, and as Irish speakers. But that’s only part of the story. Making a promise is one thing, keeping it is another.

According to the polls, it looks like Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil will be able to form a coalition government with the support of another party (the Greens for example).

The most important thing is to have a conversation with the political candidates in your area and let them know what you want from them. If they agree to do your bidding, get their commitment to that before casting your vote for them. If they are elected, be sure to keep putting pressure on them to keep their promises – especially on the Irish language!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

.

.

.

.

.

en_USEnglish